{"id":94804,"date":"2022-03-03t12:00:06","date_gmt":"2022-03-03t17:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/?p=94804"},"modified":"2023-12-13t17:18:26","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13t22:18:26","slug":"four-reasons-that-cpa-firms-fear-mergers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2022\/03\/03\/four-reasons-that-cpa-firms-fear-mergers\/","title":{"rendered":"four reasons to fear a merger"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>and eight ways to tell that one was successful.<\/strong><\/p>\n by marc rosenberg<\/em> as a generation of aging baby boomer partners continues its relentless march toward retirement, thousands of firms are seeking the only exit strategy available to them: merge into another firm.<\/p>\n more:\u00a0<\/strong> 12 shifts to ensure firm success<\/a>\u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0eisneramper ceo explains the firm\u2019s private equity deal<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0why it\u2019s time for an acquisition<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0are you overthinking an m&a deal?<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0the 9 biggest merger pitfalls<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0will new taxes push you to cash out?<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0the managing partner\u2019s role in mergers<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0inside a partner comp committee<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0making partner: the essential metrics<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0want to be a partner? meet these 17 expectations<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0five reasons not to make someone a partner<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0do you really need another partner?<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0six big mistakes in succession planning<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0new non-compete laws don\u2019t affect cpa firms<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0evaluating the managing partner<\/a> \u00a0|\u00a0\u00a0what a firm needs from its leaders<\/a> \u00a0|<\/p>\n exclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n thus has a voracious appetite for mergers been created at all size levels, particularly:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ask a partner from a smaller firm that merged upward whether the match has proven successful, and the likelihood is you\u2019ll get a less-than-enthusiastic response. why isn\u2019t this partner jumping for joy? is it because the merger didn\u2019t work? rarely.<\/p>\n albert einstein famously said, \u201cif only i could think of the right questions\u201d (i.e., not the right answers). well, that\u2019s what doing a merger successfully is all about: asking the right questions.<\/p>\n look at the reasons why the merger was done in the first place and see if those goals were met. here are some of the right questions a partner could ask after a merger is completed to determine if it was successful:<\/p>\n if the answers to most of these questions are \u201cyes,\u201d then the merger was a success. but don\u2019t conclude that the merger didn\u2019t work simply because you are not jumping for joy.<\/p>\n here are some reasons we\u2019ve heard over the years why firms are reluctant to pursue upward mergers:<\/p>\n reason #1: we fear a loss of control.<\/strong><\/p>\n response: what do you fear? name one thing. i have yet to talk to a \u201chesitant\u201d firm that can name even one specific valid<\/strong> fear. the loss of control issue is usually a mindset or fear of the unknown that dissipates once the merger takes place. however, if you fear being held accountable for things you know you should <\/strong>be held accountable for (like collecting your receivables, billing your wip on time, getting your timesheet in on time), then the fear may be valid.<\/p>\n reason #2: we\u2019ve been independent for so long, we\u2019ve gotten used to it. we won\u2019t be happy at a larger firm where they \u201ctell us what to do.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n response: if you are productive, manage a decent-sized client base, have acceptable technical skills, maintain good relationships with clients and firm personnel and have no skeletons in the closet, the buyer isn\u2019t going to tell you what to do. at least not in ways that will cause you unhappiness.<\/p>\n reason #3: we feel like we\u2019ve failed the firm by merging out of existence.<\/strong><\/p>\n response: what\u2019s the alternative, dying in your chair? seeing the firm deteriorate to a shadow of itself while the partners hang on in their dotage? by merging, the partners are being proactive about preserving their clients, providing jobs for their staff and giving themselves a way to retire gracefully. there\u2019s no shame in merging up. you\u2019ve got lots of company: 80 percent of all firms never make it to the second generation. it\u2019s been done before and will be done again and again.<\/p>\n reason #4: we hear from a lot of other firms that mergers just don\u2019t work.<\/strong><\/p>\n response: our experience is that mergers do<\/strong> work \u2026 if you do them right. doing mergers \u201cright\u201d means:<\/p>\n your merger will<\/strong> work if you do your homework! ask the right questions.<\/p>\n when a smaller firm merges up, that poignant \u201cend of an era\u201d feeling is to be expected. it\u2019s a natural emotional response. but merging with another firm is no reason for remorse. when done right, it\u2019s a courageous step forward.<\/p>\n of course, when a merger is done wrong, just as with any decision made poorly, you are bound to be unhappy with the outcome.<\/p>\n there are three merger types:<\/p>\n though there are obvious differences among the mergers above, there are many similarities as well.<\/p>\n negotiation<\/strong><\/p>\n \u201cnegotiation\u201d can take on two different meanings in the realm of cpa firm mergers:<\/p>\n examples of issues commonly open to negotiation in the true sense of the word:<\/p>\n this type of negotiation is the less<\/strong> common of the two because most \u201cmergers\u201d are acquisitions in substance, if not in form. accordingly, terms are, to a large extent, dictated by the buyer.<\/p>\n merger vs. acquisition<\/strong><\/p>\n in reality, the vast majority of \u201cmergers\u201d are really acquisitions in substance, though not necessarily in form. in these mergers, there is no doubt that the larger firm is the \u201csurviving\u201d firm and the smaller firm will cease to exist.<\/p>\n buyer and seller<\/strong><\/p>\n the larger firm is considered the \u201cbuyer\u201d and the smaller firm is considered the \u201cseller\u201d even though legally in a merger there may be no sale or acquisition.<\/p>\n partner<\/strong><\/p>\n there are two kinds of partners at cpa firms: equity and non-equity. some firms prefer the term \u201cincome partner\u201d instead of non-equity partner; the two terms are synonymous. equity partners are owners of the firm. non-equity partners are partner in name only and rarely have an ownership interest in the firm.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\ncpa firm mergers: your complete guide<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n\n
do mergers work?<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
some definitions of terms<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n