{"id":82812,"date":"2021-04-01t22:00:43","date_gmt":"2021-04-02t02:00:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=82812"},"modified":"2023-10-05t09:20:07","modified_gmt":"2023-10-05t13:20:07","slug":"the-managing-partners-role-in-mergers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2021\/04\/01\/the-managing-partners-role-in-mergers\/","title":{"rendered":"the managing partner\u2019s role in mergers"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>17 key factors and 18 common turnoffs. bonus: an 8-point history of cpa firm mergers.<\/strong><\/p>\n by marc rosenberg<\/i> we have discussed how the managing partner impacts organic<\/strong> growth activities. but a major growth strategy was not addressed: mergers and acquisitions, or more precisely, how managing partners impact m&a at their firms.<\/p>\n more: <\/b>10 ways to hold partners accountable<\/a> | five ways to evaluate partners<\/a> | manage partners with goal setting<\/a> | overarching authority that managing partners must have<\/a> when managing partners are asked what their revenue growth is, they invariably respond something like this: \u201cwe grew 12 percent last year, 8 percent organically and 4 percent through mergers.\u201d it\u2019s almost like the 4 percent from mergers didn\u2019t count. but this is changing. why firms merge<\/strong><\/p>\n cpa firms merge in smaller firms for these reasons:<\/p>\n another reason for mergers is that it\u2019s getting harder and harder to attract new clients. many firms find it less costly and time-consuming to buy<\/strong> clients and talent rather than try to develop them internally.<\/p>\n a very short history of cpa firm mergers<\/strong><\/p>\n highly successful sellers, especially those in the largest american cities, continue to be hotly sought after.<\/p>\n \u201cfirms expect artificial intelligence, blockchain and data analytics to substantially reduce the demand for traditional accounting services. as a result, demand for niche mergers in areas such as cybersecurity, hr, it, wealth management and litigation support, to name a few, is skyrocketing.\u201d<\/p>\n mergers vs. acquisitions<\/strong><\/p>\n let\u2019s clarify two terms often used synonymously:<\/p>\n throughout this post and related ones, we use the term \u201cmergers\u201d to describe both mergers and acquisitions.<\/p>\n the state of the cpa firm merger market<\/strong><\/p>\n as time marches on, there will undoubtedly be some<\/strong> changes, but most of this summary will likely apply for several years to come.<\/p>\n common turnoffs to buyers<\/strong><\/p>\n this is a list of things that are likely to turn off buyers in today\u2019s buyers\u2019 market. i\u2019ve personally experienced each of them multiple times in recent years.<\/p>\n do mergers work?<\/strong><\/p>\n yes … if you do them right. what do i mean by that?<\/p>\n a firm asked me to facilitate a merger of equal-size firms. both were located in a major city. the firms were both successful, had attractive client bases and were profitable. there were tremendous synergies to be had: the strengths of one firm were weaknesses of the other, and vice versa.<\/p>\n the firms decided to handle the merger negotiations themselves rather than hire me to help. a year later, they invited me to facilitate the first partner retreat of the newly combined firm. to my horror, i found that literally nothing had been done in a year to combine the two firms and exploit the synergies. the reason was a weak managing partner of the overall firm. it will come as no surprise to you that the firms demerged a few years later.<\/p>\n a year later, i asked some of the partners if they were happy with the merger. one said, \u201cwe\u2019re not jumping for joy.\u201d i asked him to explain. he said, \u201cwhen we were on our own, we may not have had the greatest firm, but we were happy. we were entrepreneurial. we were our own bosses. we were independent. we had all been there a long time and were comfortable with the way things worked. but now things are different. we\u2019ve lost control of our firm and we feel like we\u2019ve failed by merging out of existence, unable to preserve the firm\u2019s legacy.\u201d<\/p>\n this is the wrong way to measure the success of a merger! how the partners emotionally feel<\/strong> about it shouldn\u2019t be the main issue. this is the main way to measure whether the merger worked:<\/p>\n these<\/strong> should be the measures of merger success, not the fact that you lost that lovin’ feeling (props to the righteous brothers) and pine for the good old days that were doomed to end.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\nthe role of the managing partner<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n
\nexclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
\nin the third decade of this century, mergers are representing a substantial 25-35 percent of cpa firms\u2019 growth. if you look at public comments by large corporations, they rarely break out their growth between organic and merger. that\u2019s because they view mergers as a perfectly normal and expected method of growth. they count<\/strong> as much as internal growth. cpa firms need to adopt the same mentality.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n<\/strong><\/li>\n
\n<\/strong><\/li>\n\n
\n<\/strong><\/li>\n\n
\n
\n<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n
\n