2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\nthere are two messages here, one obvious and one that is deeper. <\/span> \n<\/p>\n\nfirst, many firms, especially those below $15 million in revenue, use partner comp as the primary way to communicate to partners whether they have performed well and met expectations. believing <\/span>partners\u2019 performance and behavior\u00a0<\/span>can be modified simply<\/span> with money, management essentially says, \u201cif you do good, you\u2019ll get a big check. keep doing what you\u2019ve been doing! if your performance is below expectations, then your income allocation may disappoint you.\u201d in the latter case, the firm hopes that the dissatisfied partner takes this \u201cmessage\u201d to heart and works hard to do better.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span> \n<\/b><\/li>\nthe deeper message this partner conveyed was that the best, most effective way to improve anyone\u2019s performance \u2013 not just partners \u2013 is with communication and coaching, not by the size of the paycheck. successful firms establish a strong link <\/span>between partners\u2019 compensation and the extent to which they succeed at helping the firm achieve its goals.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\nhere are eight ways this is accomplished:<\/span><\/p>\n\nclearly define what the firm needs from its partners.<\/span><\/b> many <\/span>call<\/span> this strategic planning or creating a vision. partners obviously can\u2019t do what the firm needs until someone articulates what those needs are. a firm can have an innovative and inspiring strategic plan, but it will mean nothing if it\u2019s not executed by the partners.<\/span><\/li>\nall partners should have written roles, expectations and very specific goals.<\/span><\/b> this applies to their role in achieving the strategic plan <\/span>as well as<\/span> their operational goals (bringing in clients, mentoring staff, billing, collection, delivering quality service, etc.).<\/span><\/li>\nintangibles must play an important role in <\/span><\/b>allocating<\/span><\/b>\u00a0partner\u00a0<\/span><\/b>income<\/span><\/b>. <\/span><\/b>we all know the tangibles \u2013 finding, minding and grinding. but the intangibles are important too \u2013 managing the firm or a team, <\/span>delegating clients to other firm members, mentoring and nurturing staff while helping them learn and grow; living and breathing the firm\u2019s core values.<\/li>\nbring down \u201cbook of business\u201d from its pedestal.<\/span><\/b> book of business is probably the ugliest term ever invented by cpa firms. it connotes \u201ci vs. we<\/span>,<\/span>\u201d clients owned by the partner instead of the firm and the firm merely\u00a0<\/span>acting as<\/span>\u00a0a group of solos instead of\u00a0<\/span>one<\/span> firm. firms must reduce the potential<\/span>ly<\/span> huge impact that book of business has on compensation and partner buyout. managing a large client base <\/span>should always be<\/span>\u00a0important but delegating clients to others<\/span>\u00a0and working as a team<\/span> is also important when this is best for the firm. also \u2026<\/span><\/li>\ndifferentiate origination (finding) from billing responsibility (minding).\u00a0<\/span><\/b>suppose a firm has two partners, equal in every way shape and form (age, experience, personality, etc.). they also have the same $1 million client <\/span>responsibility<\/span>. <\/span>f<\/span>urther suppose that one partner originated 100 percent of her client base and the other originated $50,000, with the remainder delegated to him. <\/span>both partners are valuable to the firm but c<\/span>learly<\/span>,<\/span>\u00a0the first partner should be paid more than the second. the point here is that in allocating partner income, the firm must look beyond client base managed\u00a0<\/span>and also<\/span>\u00a0factor in\u00a0<\/span>client origination.<\/span><\/li>\nthe managing partner should <\/span><\/b>impact income allocation more than other partners<\/span><\/b>.<\/strong> there are two types of mps: <\/span>those who are expected to manage<\/span>\u00a0the performance and behavior of the other partners<\/span>,\u00a0<\/span>growth and profitability<\/span>\u00a0and those who are not.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>the latter is more of an\u00a0<\/span>admin partner than a true mp. <\/span>t<\/span>rue mps\u00a0<\/span>should<\/span>\u00a0have a much more significant role in allocating income than<\/span>\u00a0all<\/span> the other partners. this <\/span>is often done<\/span>\u00a0with the mp being the chair of the firm\u2019s compensation committee<\/span>\u00a0and\/or<\/span>\u00a0the mp having near total discretion in allocating a\u00a0<\/span>bonus pool. <\/span>although<\/span>\u00a0money isn\u2019t the best way to motivate a partner, it\u00a0<\/span>does<\/strong>\u00a0help mps\u00a0<\/span>to\u00a0<\/span>have partner compensation as\u00a0<\/span>a<\/span>\u00a0weapon in their arsenal.<\/span><\/li>\ncommunication. communication. communication. <\/span><\/b>show me a subjective performance-based partner compensation system (comp committee or mp-decides) where there is little or no communication between individual partners and management regarding performance, and i\u2019ll show you a system that is\u00a0<\/span>doomed to fail.<\/span><\/li>\nadopt a compensation committee to allocate partner income<\/span><\/b>.<\/strong> this is the best way to incorporate <\/span>all of<\/span>\u00a0the items above in your income allocation\u00a0<\/span>system<\/span>. the comp committee is the system of choice for <\/span>the vast majority of<\/span> firms eight partners and above. why? because it\u2019s the best for (a) balancing production with intangible performance factors, (b) allowing the committee to use its best judgment to assess each partner\u2019s performance without being restricted by formulas, (c) making great use of goal setting and (d) allowing the firm to link partner income with what the firm needs from its partners.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"is your firm’s message clear or cloaked?<\/strong> \nby marc rosenberg<\/em> \nthe rosenberg practice management library<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1339,"featured_media":52068,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1363,2374,3120,3002,2266],"tags":[2429,572,38,1416],"class_list":["post-67758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-pay-compensation","category-pro-member-exclusive","category-special","category-partner","tag-earnings","tag-pay","tag-salary","tag-wages"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n8 ways comp systems get partners to do what the firm needs - 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n