{"id":5843,"date":"2010-03-12t06:02:11","date_gmt":"2010-03-12t10:02:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=5843"},"modified":"2024-11-19t21:48:37","modified_gmt":"2024-11-20t02:48:37","slug":"cpa-net-income-per-partner-surges-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2010\/03\/12\/cpa-net-income-per-partner-surges-16\/","title":{"rendered":"cpa net income per partner surges 16%"},"content":{"rendered":"
(what recession?)<\/strong><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

the surprising thing about\u00a0 aomar’s<\/em> cpa firm practice management survey 2010<\/em> is that there were so few surprises. the study turned up very few significant changes between 2009 and 2010.<\/p>\n

of course, it’s possible that the major metrics could lag a year and show up in next year’s survey. or, it could mean that firms have been more resilient than many would care to boast about.<\/p>\n

one good sign you can’t ignore: net income per partner increased by over 16 percent. (what recession?)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/strong><\/td>\n2010<\/strong><\/td>\n2009<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
leverage<\/strong><\/td>\n6.6<\/strong><\/td>\n6.8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
utilization<\/strong><\/td>\n1,164<\/strong><\/td>\n1,108<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
billing rate<\/strong><\/td>\n$135<\/strong><\/td>\n$132<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
realization<\/strong><\/td>\n91.3%<\/strong><\/td>\n92.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
profit margin<\/strong><\/td>\n36.5%<\/strong><\/td>\n34.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
net income per partner<\/strong><\/td>\n$330,723<\/strong><\/td>\n$283,364<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n