{"id":55472,"date":"2018-10-16t05:00:51","date_gmt":"2018-10-16t09:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=55472"},"modified":"2018-10-23t20:14:15","modified_gmt":"2018-10-24t00:14:15","slug":"optimize-scanning-procedures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2018\/10\/16\/optimize-scanning-procedures\/","title":{"rendered":"optimize scanning procedures"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>first front-end scanning, then ocr. by roman h. kepczyk<\/i> for the next few years it is anticipated that accounting firm clients will deliver the majority of their organizers and supporting tax documents to the firm in a physical format.<\/p>\n more: <\/b>why a digital tax workflow system is vital<\/a> | survey: 72% of firms annotate pdfs<\/a> | survey: 67% turn client documents into pdfs<\/a> | how 53% of firms use intranets to work smarter<\/a> | check your bandwidth<\/a> | microsoft office 201x vs. office 365<\/a> | how the cloud plays into scheduled server replacement<\/a> | monitor real estate: more is better<\/a> to utilize this information in a paperless environment, it must be effectively scanned and managed at the lowest possible cost. early paperless adopters scanned the tax return and the supporting documents at the back end of the process when a return was complete. scanning should be done primarily by administrative personnel (81% according to the 2009 aaa benchmark survey) to promote adherence to firm standards and so it is done at a lower cost. having a tax senior available to answer any questions from the scanning person will help build quality control into the process at the front end.<\/p>\n firms have found that having a dedicated scanner attached to a workstation is the most effective method of capturing these images. according to the 2018 cpafma it survey, the top-rated scanners selected by cpa firms are the fujitsu fi (64%) and canon dr series (21%). images should be scanned at a standard 300dpi in black-and-white format. to minimize the amount of rescanning because of scan errors, firms should implement automatic correction software integrated with their scanner such as kofax vrs, which does contrast resolution, despeckling and straightening on each image individually.<\/p>\n once a firm has effectively implemented<\/p>\n the firm can then consider mid-level or preferably front-end scanning. mid-level scanning integrates the traditional manual preparation process with files being scanned prior to review. the advantage to this process is that the tax review can be done anywhere and at any time the reviewer has digital access to the files.<\/p>\n as far back as 2009, the aaa (now cpafma) survey found \u201c86% of firms were scanning client supplied information and 81% were primarily utilizing administrative personnel to do scanning.\u201d \u2013 2009 aaa survey<\/p><\/blockquote>\n the other, preferred option is to go directly to front end-scanning in which there are significant advantages for capturing and organizing information and eventually automatically inputting this data into the return. front-end scanning can be optimized with a standard bookmarking application that takes the information provided by clients and electronically organizes it in a firm standard format. the resulting image file is in a standard pdf format, which the preparer would have on one screen, with the tax input application on the other.<\/p>\n tools such as cch fxscan, sureprep 1040scan, thomson source document scanning and drake gruntworx can usually identify and organize between 50 percent and 75 percent of the client source documents. therefore, the preparer would only have to move the remaining unidentified documents. for marking up these documents, many firms use adobe acrobat tools, which can be somewhat cumbersome to use. more commonly, firms use tools such as cch pdflyer, cpaperless tictie calculate and xcm solutions\u2019 toolbar, which are robust pdf annotation tools designed for accountants to add tic marks and calculator tapes (as well as using the moffsoft calculator for this purpose).<\/p>\n we believe all firms will standardize upon front-end scanning processes within the next few years as they are the precursor to automatic input technologies utilizing optical character recognition. today\u2019s scanning applications recognize many of the client\u2019s source documents for bookmarking along with the specific data fields from recognized forms. the application will place the data in the appropriate place on the tax return, which cch refers to as autoflow and thomson reuters calls source document processing.<\/p>\n \u201c67% of firms used digital tools to organize\/bookmark scanned source documents and 49% are utilizing intelligent scanning tools that input data from the source document to the actual return.\u201d \u2013 cpafma 2017 survey<\/p><\/blockquote>\n additional features of the software include determining the level of accuracy of the scanned information and whether it is in the correct location. if an error is detected, the application will change the color to highlight a possible error. this process will not only save time on the return preparation but also on the firm\u2019s review processes, which are often the most expensive bottleneck in the firm\u2019s tax production process.<\/p>\n recommended action:<\/strong> purchase adequate production scanner and implement scanning applications to organize and optimize the importing of tax information.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nquantum of paperless<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n
\nexclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
\nthis is still usually the first step when firms transition from a completely manual environment. by doing back-end scanning first, the firm can get used to working with digital files and naming conventions\u00a0\u2013 prior to forcing changes in the preparation and review processes\u00a0\u2013 which can then be transitioned to front-end scanning.<\/p>\n\n