{"id":55457,"date":"2018-09-02t11:00:42","date_gmt":"2018-09-02t15:00:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=55457"},"modified":"2018-09-13t09:08:23","modified_gmt":"2018-09-13t13:08:23","slug":"partner-agreement-issues-affecting-women","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2018\/09\/02\/partner-agreement-issues-affecting-women\/","title":{"rendered":"partner agreement issues affecting women"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>the biggest issue? how part-time partners are treated.<\/strong><\/p>\n by <\/i>marc rosenberg<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n yes. yes.\u00a0 i understand that the title of this post may be offensive to both men (why do we need special rules for women?) and women (why do we need to be singled out \u2013 isn\u2019t it a given in the 21st<\/sup> century that women and men should be treated equally?).<\/p>\n more:<\/b> mandatory retirement: pros and cons (and is it legal?)<\/a> | partner duties, prohibitions and grounds for expulsion<\/a> | principals who aren\u2019t cpas<\/a> | why non-compete and non-solicitation covenants matter<\/a> | handling pay during the disability of a partner<\/a> | why voting isn\u2019t such a big deal<\/a> the good news is that i don\u2019t see many partner agreements that blatantly<\/strong> discriminate against women.
\nexclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n read more →<\/a><\/p>\n