{"id":53556,"date":"2018-01-08t07:30:11","date_gmt":"2018-01-08t12:30:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=53556"},"modified":"2018-02-01t15:56:36","modified_gmt":"2018-02-01t20:56:36","slug":"10-steps-start-innovating","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2018\/01\/08\/10-steps-start-innovating\/","title":{"rendered":"10 steps to start innovating"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>do you want your firm to last after you’re gone? by jody padar<\/i> cpas are busy people \u2013 often to the detriment of their customers. when cpas don\u2019t have time to understand their customers, they fail to give them real value and creative solutions.<\/p>\n more on radicalism:<\/b> how \u2018agile\u2019 applies to cpa firms<\/a> | introducing the fifth radical tenet: the business model<\/a> | dear midsized firms: yes, you can change<\/a> | the four tenets of radical firms: a brief review<\/a> this is really concerning to me. it concerns me that many cpas are unwilling to do the work to keep their firms relevant. although they know that the world no longer works the way it did 20 years ago, they simply shrug their shoulders or look the other way because confronting change seems like too much work. but here\u2019s what i think is really creating the problem: succession, older partners and their desire to retire.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n it will take time, effort, and money to invest in your firm in order to remain relevant \u2013 not just today, but for generations to come. that is, if you want your firm to stick around. however, what i\u2019m finding is that these retiring cpas are not willing to give up their compensation or their status within a firm in order to make the changes.<\/p>\n i\u2019ve got news: it\u2019s highly unlikely that the next generation of cpas will purchase an old-school firm. it\u2019s way easier to open a new online firm, embrace the cloud and steal clients ready to jump. this is the biggest problem. many cpas are just flat out getting outpaced.<\/p>\n if you are a midsized firm, you\u2019ve built your business to where it is today, and you can pivot your business into being more future-ready. here are 10 steps you can take now to begin the process.<\/p>\n irrelevance is dangerous to your practice. for many radical cpas this is an opportunity because we are staying in front of the changes. but for the old-school types, this stagnancy is death. agile firms will use whatever technology they have to their advantage and watch their growth double organically with ease.<\/p>\n i hate to say this, but firms that don\u2019t keep up and provide their customers with the best possible solutions could subject themselves to malpractice.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n when cpas believe that the world works the same as it did 20 years ago, they don\u2019t ask the right questions. by not asking the correct questions, they miss regulatory compliance issues by their own self-limiting thoughts. nexus applies to exponentially more companies today because of the world of remote work. just because your firm doesn\u2019t allow remote work, doesn\u2019t mean the rest of the world is not working remotely with multistate issues and questions aren\u2019t being asked.<\/p>\n i\u2019m not trying to scare you into going radical \u2013 though i clearly think you should. i\u2019m just telling you what you can expect if you don\u2019t keep up with technology and innovation and their direct impact on regulatory issues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nfrom success to significance: the radical cpa guide<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n
\nexclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
\nthe reason? they just don\u2019t know where to start. when something becomes overwhelming it\u2019s easier to ignore it or look the other way than to try and figure it out.<\/p>\nmidsized firms, begin here.<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n