{"id":51621,"date":"2017-04-01t05:00:50","date_gmt":"2017-04-01t09:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=51621"},"modified":"2017-04-18t10:01:58","modified_gmt":"2017-04-18t14:01:58","slug":"president-proposes-adding-6-justices-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2017\/04\/01\/president-proposes-adding-6-justices-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"president proposes adding 6 justices to supreme court"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>everything old is new again.<\/strong><\/p>\n by ed mendlowitz<\/i> the president sent a bill to congress proposing a plan to add six justices to the supreme court. the way his plan will work is that as each justice reaches age 70\u00bd and fails to retire, a new justice will be added.<\/p>\n more on marketing: <\/b>advertising done right<\/a> | 12 branding tips<\/a> | 11 ways to get more tax clients<\/a> | structuring partnership and buy-sell agreements<\/a> | the 64-point business startup checklist<\/a> | how to offer second opinions<\/a> the way his plan will work is that as each justice reaches age 70\u00bd and fails to retire, a new justice will be added. this was precipitated by the slew of recent court rulings declaring his sponsored legislation unconstitutional. presently there are nine justices, with six over the age of 70\u00bd, so if the president\u2019s proposal becomes law and none retire he will get to nominate all six immediately. of course, the senate will still have to confirm them, but given the present majority his party has, that would be a perfunctory procedure. the undeniable purpose is for more of his legislative initiatives to remain law, accomplish the president\u2019s objectives, and to also back up some of his campaign promises. an added problem is that there might be an even number of justices making it harder for a majority decision in some cases.<\/p>\n the undeniable purpose is for more of his legislative initiatives to remain law, to accomplish the president\u2019s objectives and to also back up some of his campaign promises. an added problem is that there might be an even number of justices, making it harder for a majority decision in some cases.<\/p>\n in the judiciary act of 1869 congress established that the united states supreme court would consist of the chief justice and eight associate justices. since the u.s. constitution does not define the size of the supreme court, the president avers that it is within congress\u2019 power to change the size to any number it so desires, and that 15 is the appropriate number.<\/p>\n this has met with widespread opposition, including many members of the president\u2019s party. the president has taken his position to the media to present his case to the american public.<\/p>\n while there has been active, vocal and organized opposition, the most recent supreme court decision affirmed a contested law by a 5-4 vote. the threat of the president\u2019s proposal being enacted seems to have attributed to the unexpected shift in the decision by justice roberts, who was fully expected to vote to overturn that law. justice roberts is known to work strongly to assert the independence of the court and to keep it out of the theater of political controversy.<\/p>\n the affirmative vote seems to have accomplished justice roberts\u2019 objectives because it appears support for the president\u2019s proposal is waning. in fact, the media is referring to roberts\u2019 vote as the \u201cswitch in time that saved nine.\u201d<\/p>\n because the above was posted on april fool\u2019s day it might seem like a plausible \u201ctrick.\u201d however, everything above is exactly true, but it occurred in 1937. the president was franklin delano roosevelt and the judge was associate justice owen roberts.<\/p>\n happy april first!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\nthe 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 practice doctor<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n
\nexclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/p>\n