{"id":48815,"date":"2016-05-15t05:00:19","date_gmt":"2016-05-15t09:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=48815"},"modified":"2024-08-14t09:35:51","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t13:35:51","slug":"partner-pay-the-declining-importance-of-book-of-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2016\/05\/15\/partner-pay-the-declining-importance-of-book-of-business\/","title":{"rendered":"partner pay: why your book of business isn’t worth as much"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"young<\/a>four reasons behind the decline. plus the impact on buyouts and retirements.<\/strong><\/p>\n

by marc rosenberg<\/span><\/i>
\n
partner comp: art & science<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n

i\u2019m sure many people see the title of this post\u00a0as a form of practice management heresy.<\/p>\n

more on partner compensation:<\/b> 5 other systems for paying partners<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>3 non-performance-based comp systems<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>3 subjective compensation systems<\/span><\/a> |<\/span> partner compensation 101<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>|<\/span> what partners earn and how they earn it<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>partner compensation: an art, not a science<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>why most partner comp systems are performance-based<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

the message is: the weighting of book of business is trending from being the \u201cend-all\u201d in allocating partner income, or close to it, to a factor that is still important, but less so.
\n
read more →<\/a><\/p>\n