{"id":48769,"date":"2016-05-01t05:00:56","date_gmt":"2016-05-01t09:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=48769"},"modified":"2024-08-14t09:35:53","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t13:35:53","slug":"48769","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2016\/05\/01\/48769\/","title":{"rendered":"5 other systems for paying partners"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"money<\/a>why balanced scorecard is mbo in new clothing.<\/strong><\/p>\n

by marc rosenberg<\/span><\/i>
\n
partner comp: art & science<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n

there are many partner compensation formulas, some performance-based and some not, some more subjective than others.<\/p>\n

more on partner compensation:<\/b> 3 non-performance-based comp systems<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>the 3 best partner compensation formulas<\/span><\/a> |<\/span> 11 points in designing a partner comp system<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>what partners earn and how they earn it<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>partner compensation: an art, not a science<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>how partners view compensation: it\u2019s not all about the money<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>why most partner comp systems are performance-based<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

the systems below are less common than others, but some firms are attracted to them, especially small firms.
\n
read more →<\/a><\/p>\n