{"id":46583,"date":"2016-03-13t05:00:16","date_gmt":"2016-03-13t09:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=46583"},"modified":"2024-08-14t09:35:59","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t13:35:59","slug":"2050-fmg-face-trouble","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2016\/03\/13\/2050-fmg-face-trouble\/","title":{"rendered":"the 3 best partner compensation formulas"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"two<\/a>4 common carve-outs, 9 challenges and 10 complications of all compensation systems.<\/strong><\/p>\n

by marc rosenberg<\/span><\/i>
\n
partner comp: art & science<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n

compensation formulas are the most common system for\u00a0allocating partner income.<\/p>\n

more partner compensation for pro members\u00a0<\/strong>(go pro here<\/a><\/span>):<\/strong>\u00a0why firms use partner comp formulas<\/span><\/a>|<\/span>3 subjective compensation systems<\/span><\/a> |\u00a0<\/b>11 points in designing a partner comp system<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>3 tiers of compensation<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>partner compensation 101<\/span><\/a>|<\/span>what partners earn and how they earn it<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>partner compensation: an art, not a science<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>how partners view compensation: it\u2019s not all about the money<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>why most partner comp systems are performance-based<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

now let’s look at some of the better formula systems we’ve seen:<\/p>\n

read more →<\/a><\/p>\n