{"id":46256,"date":"2015-12-16t05:00:45","date_gmt":"2015-12-16t10:00:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=46256"},"modified":"2024-08-14t11:28:20","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t15:28:20","slug":"46256","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2015\/12\/16\/46256\/","title":{"rendered":"best practices for mandatory retirement"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"time<\/a>the work retired partners should \u2013 and shouldn’t \u2013 do if they stay on.<\/strong><\/p>\n

by <\/span><\/i>bill reeb<\/span><\/i><\/a> and <\/span><\/i>dominic cingoranelli<\/span><\/i><\/a>
\n卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 \/ succession institute<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n

once \u201cfair\u201d retirement benefits have been determined, for this moment in time, we can move on to the next step in building our succession plan. the reason i mention that we are simply putting stakes in the ground is because as we set additional stakes in the ground, those new stakes might require us to rethink a decision made when setting a previous stake.<\/p>\n

more on performance management:<\/b> how retirement issues affect succession planning<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>how partner ratings factor into equity<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>the pitfalls of equity allocation and reallocation<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>develop your employees or suffer the consequences<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

for example, if the firm later establishes premium perks for past owners who want to continue to work for the firm after sale of ownership, then that might require reassessing the retirement benefit calculation agreed to when setting that earlier stake (because in the end, the retirement benefit is about the whole package offered, not just one component).
\n read more →<\/a><\/p>\n