\n\n cch prosystem fx practice management<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 13<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 20%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n microsoft crm<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 12%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n outlook<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 9%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n goldmine<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 8%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n excel<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n salesforce.com<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 6%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n access<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n act!<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 5%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n cch<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n custom solution<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n firmworks<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n visual practice management<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 3%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n 12 others<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 12<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n 24%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n grand total<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n 66<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n 100%<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\ndespite strong interest in crm, there is still widespread confusion around the definition of crm, what functionality this provides, what the best practices are and how to choose the right solution.\u00c2\u00a0 some cpa firms are choosing simple contact management solutions, time management software and even using simple desktop software believing they will garner crm-like benefits which is unlikely.<\/p>\n accountants are in the business of relationships but are confused about crm<\/strong><\/p>\ncrm solutions contain, organize and help manage every relationship of the firm.\u00c2\u00a0 accounting firms, by definition, are in the relationship business.\u00c2\u00a0 therefore it’s surprising how many have not taken the time to embrace crm and capitalize on the benefits.\u00c2\u00a0 firms that value their client relationships strive to provide excellent customer service, desire to increase revenues with existing clients and find new buyers of their services.\u00c2\u00a0 they cannot afford to let their competition gain the benefits of crm at their expense.<\/p>\n crm is part of an overall strategic commitment to relationships<\/strong><\/p>\ncrm is one of the fastest growing categories in the software industry and its growth is expected to continue. according to gartner this overall segment grew 12.5% globally in 2008.\u00c2\u00a0 microsoft’s crm solution grew 75 percent and salesforce.com grew 42.7 percent as the growth leaders.\u00c2\u00a0 early software solutions lacked functionality, were difficult to use, could not be tailored to meet unique business needs and were difficult to integrate with desktop software. the result was expensive and users refused to use it. today’s generation of crm solutions provide robust capabilities, can be easily tailored to meet a firm’s needs and at can be integrated with everyday office software. firms considered to be operating best practices are taking advantage of these tools.<\/p>\n in many cases, the factors necessary for a successful crm implementation, user adoption and return on investment have not been articulated properly by crm vendors to meet the needs of an accounting firm.\u00c2\u00a0 as with any software solution, expectations can easily be overstated while challenges are understated.\u00c2\u00a0 crm efforts have failed in some companies by focusing exclusively on the technology, not complementing it with enhanced business processes that fit the business.<\/p>\n firms should be utilizing the capabilities to report on business metrics which can easily be displayed as dashboards. these failures can be avoided with clear executive sponsorship, focusing on improving processes around the technology and selecting a solution that is integrated with other systems.\u00c2\u00a0 accounting firms need a mandate from their partners to improve client relationship management and the improve revenue operations for the near term and the future.\u00c2\u00a0 crm is the underlying catalyst that enables an improved process and business results.<\/p>\n self-fulfilling prophecy <\/strong><\/p>\naccounting firms run the risk of being ignored by the crm providers. best practices and enhanced solutions come from real life experiences. if accounting firms are slow to adopt and understand best practice, it is likely that crm solutions providers will bypass the accounting industry and focus on other industries that are moving more quickly to leverage crm.<\/p>\n accounting has slow adoption even if it’s been a top priority for other industries<\/strong><\/p>\naccording to a report from ami partners<\/span><\/a> in 2007, mid-market firms are more open to crm. almost 40 percent of respondents in the mid-market category used crm solutions at that time, and another 25 percent were planning on adopting crm in the next twelve months. what may be surprising to cpa firms is that professional services companies exceeded other sectors in crm adoption and spending.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n international data corporation<\/strong><\/p>\naccording to a recently completed return on investment (roi) study from research giant idc in 2004, successful implementations of customer relationship management (crm) applications have yielded returns ranging from 16% to more than 1,000%. idc also found that technology-related savings account for only 7% of the average return, while benefits accrued from increased productivity and business process enhancements account for 51% and 42% of the return.<\/p>\n other key findings from idc’s roi study, the financial impact of crm, include:<\/p>\n \n- 19% of the companies that participated in the study generated an roi of 50% or less, 52% generated an roi between 51% and 500%, and 30% reported returns of 501% or more.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |