{"id":36860,"date":"2015-06-04t05:00:16","date_gmt":"2015-06-04t09:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=36860"},"modified":"2024-08-14t09:36:28","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t13:36:28","slug":"clawback-handle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2015\/06\/04\/clawback-handle\/","title":{"rendered":"clawback and how to handle it"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/a>five-year adjustments may ease partners’ minds.<\/strong><\/p>\n by marc rosenberg<\/em> some firms struggle to agree on the details of a partner retirement plan.<\/p>\n more on retirement:<\/b>\u00a0<\/b><\/b>can partners compete after they leave?<\/a> | disability is far more complex than death<\/a> | how to juggle tax considerations for partner retirement benefits<\/a> | mandatory retirement? 4 reasons the firm comes first<\/a> | you want goodwill payments? give proper retirement notice<\/a> | vesting can cover part-timers, too<\/a> | why you\u2019ll get less from your partners in a buyout than you might by selling the whole firm <\/a>| the multiple of compensation method, fully explained<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n one of the biggest items of contention is the valuation of their goodwill for internal retirement purposes. in these cases, the partners are anxious about obligating themselves to pay huge buyout benefits.<\/p>\n
\n retirements & buyouts<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n