{"id":36844,"date":"2015-04-09t05:00:47","date_gmt":"2015-04-09t09:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=36844"},"modified":"2024-08-14t09:36:33","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t13:36:33","slug":"mandatory-retirement-varies-firm-size","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2015\/04\/09\/mandatory-retirement-varies-firm-size\/","title":{"rendered":"mandatory retirement varies by firm size"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>practices between \u201clarge\u201d firms and smaller firms diverge. by marc rosenberg<\/em> as is the case with many aspects of practice management, mandatory retirement is addressed quite differently depending on the size of the firm. here is data from a recent rosenberg map survey:<\/p>\n percent of firms having mandatory retirement policies for partners:<\/b><\/p>\n more on retirement:<\/b>\u00a0<\/b><\/b>mandatory retirement? 4 reasons the firm comes first<\/a> | how to transition clients from retiring partners<\/a> | you want goodwill payments? give proper retirement notice<\/a> | retirement plan funding? what funding?<\/a> | vesting can cover part-timers, too<\/a> | retirement vesting: the devil\u2019s in the details<\/a> | compromise is in order for some goodwill payouts<\/a> | when retiring partners take a specialty with them<\/a> | if clients leave, do you reduce retirement benefits?<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n
\n retirements & buyouts<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n