{"id":34874,"date":"2014-07-28t00:14:44","date_gmt":"2014-07-28t04:14:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=34874"},"modified":"2024-08-14t11:28:46","modified_gmt":"2024-08-14t15:28:46","slug":"why-i-dont-hire-on-experience","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2014\/07\/28\/why-i-dont-hire-on-experience\/","title":{"rendered":"why i don’t hire on experience"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"edquestion: <\/strong>i know you advocate for hiring entry-level staff, but is there a situation when an experienced person should be hired?<\/p>\n

answer:<\/strong> obviously there are exceptions \u2013 but i believe they are few and far between and not worth the overall effort of only hiring experienced staff, which many small firms only hire, and occasionally larger firms do when they think a \u201cgem\u201d is available.<\/p>\n

the main reason of the whys and wherefores of the exception and hiring experienced people is that the experienced person you interview has worked for only one firm and you believe that firm has the same quality standards for training and development as you have and the person is leaving because of: read more →<\/a><\/p>\n