{"id":29784,"date":"2013-08-01t09:14:43","date_gmt":"2013-08-01t13:14:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=29784"},"modified":"2024-09-01t14:49:00","modified_gmt":"2024-09-01t18:49:00","slug":"is-more-publicity-better","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2013\/08\/01\/is-more-publicity-better\/","title":{"rendered":"is more publicity better?"},"content":{"rendered":"
or is better publicity better?<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n
by bruce w. marcus <\/em> in the early days of publicity, when it was low-down press agentry and not high-blown public relations, the idea was to get your client’s name in the paper. often. in any context. just spell it right.<\/p>\n in the early days of marketing professional services, it became clear that merely to get your firm’s name in the paper, in any context, didn’t help much. ego, maybe, but nothing more. a new approach to publicity had to be developed.<\/p>\n what worked was to get individual firm members’ names quoted in a context of expertise. “you can save a million dollars on estate taxes,” according to john smith of smith & dale, “by…”<\/i> or, “the party liable for your accident may be the person you’d least expect…” according to harry writ, of writ & writ.<\/i><\/p>\n this, in conjunction with such valuable activities as by-line articles and interviews on consequential subjects, was at the heart of the public relations program for quite a few years. some firms developed it to an art, and could produce clippings in multiples of their competitors’. soon, the competition for space was fought with clippings. who got quoted more in the wall street journal? or business week? or the new york times?<\/p>\n but is this still the way to go? is more still better?<\/p>\n probably not. in the early days, when few firms were doing any sophisticated public relations, the few firms who could play the numbers game skillfully generated very high visibility. but ultimately, five interesting facts emerged:<\/p>\n an important element of publicity, in professional services marketing, is leadership. when you can’t lead the pack, and are merely one of the pack, you’re accomplishing nothing to enhance or establish your reputation.<\/p>\n no, more is not better. better is better. less publicity, but each placement more relevant to the firm’s marketing needs. fewer clippings, but each with more impact to the firm’s reputation for expertise.<\/p>\n and relevance is better. relevance to the overall marketing objective. not publicity for publicity’s sake, but for a reason.<\/p>\n bruce w. marcus is a pioneer in professional services marketing and coauthor of “client at the core.” this is adapted from his new book, “professional services marketing 3.0,” available for purchase here<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n copyright. used by permission.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" or is better publicity better? by bruce w. marcus professional services marketing 3.0 in the early days of publicity, when it was low-down press agentry and not high-blown public relations, the idea was to get your client’s name in the … continued<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1340,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[79],"class_list":["post-29784","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-outlook","tag-marketing"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\n professional services marketing 3.0<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n\n
<\/a>