{"id":112621,"date":"2023-06-23t16:20:01","date_gmt":"2023-06-23t20:20:01","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/?p=112621"},"modified":"2024-08-27t17:02:06","modified_gmt":"2024-08-27t21:02:06","slug":"firms-must-plan-ahead-for-partner-retirement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2023\/06\/23\/firms-must-plan-ahead-for-partner-retirement\/","title":{"rendered":"firms must plan ahead for partner retirement"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>bonus: six steps for transitioning clients.<\/strong><\/p>\n by august j. aquila<\/i> the biggest danger facing the future of accounting firms today is not the economy. it is the lack of planning for partner retirement. you would think that this would be one of the most important strategic issues for firms, but unfortunately it is not.<\/p>\n more: <\/b>retiring partners are valuable assets<\/a> | how to deal with underperforming partners<\/a> | when \u2018quiet quitting\u2019 hits the partner ranks<\/a> | nine ways to handle partners with strong views<\/a> | nine standards for partner compensation<\/a> without proper retirement\/succession planning, the firm is left directionless. and, it is not only planning for the succession of the managing partner that is essential. planning for the retirement of other key partners and non-partners in the organization is important, as well. planning for retirement becomes even more critical when the retiring partner is a founder or a key rainmaker of the firm. often, these individual do not want to leave the firm and remain working at the firm longer than necessary. this policy will prevent confusion or negative feelings at retirement time.<\/p>\n retirement age<\/strong><\/p>\n the most important issue to determine is the actual retirement age. a few firms require partners to step down from the partnership at age 60. others, especially the smaller and midsize firms, have a mandatory retirement age of 65 or 66. the specific age is not as important as actually having an age designated in the agreement. setting the age can be a sensitive issue in smaller firms because the owner may feel that the younger partners are forcing him or her out. this issue is so important that it cannot be ignored.<\/p>\n retirement from the partnership does not mean retirement from the firm. the retired partner gives up his or her ownership interest. then, depending on the firm\u2019s preference, the partner can take one of several different roles, from senior partner to business development team leader to mentor.<\/p>\n many larger firms have adopted an early retirement age in order to make room for younger accountants to move up through the ranks. also, while some partners are vibrant at age 60 or 65, others may have lost a lot of their desire to continue to grow the practice. it should be up to the firm \u2013 and not the individual partner \u2013 to make any exceptions to the general retirement guidelines.<\/p>\n finally, when you have a specific age for retirement, you are better able to plan for client transition.<\/p>\n retirement notice<\/strong><\/p>\n it used to be common for a retiring partner to give a six- or 12-month notice. today, i am seeing more agreements requesting a one- to two-year notice and prohibiting a partner from retiring during the first four months of the year. for several years, firms have been creating retirement calendars.<\/p>\n this is a simple spreadsheet that shows the estimated retirement date and retirement benefit for each partner in the firm. firms usually update and discuss the retirement calendar as a part of their annual retreats. this helps the firm plan for client transitions as well as project retirement expenses. most firms have a cap on the amount they can pay out each year to retired partners and having a retirement calendar can highlight future cash flow problems.<\/p>\n retirement and deferred compensation agreements<\/strong><\/p>\n if you are going to ask retiring partners to transfer their client base or cut back on hours, make sure you are not asking them to do something that will eventually hurt their retirement payments. for example, a partner\u2019s deferred compensation is based on the average of the last three years compensation before retirement. during this time \u2013 if you ask the partner to transition clients \u2013 it will reduce his or her compensation because the compensation plan rewards for a partner\u2019s book of business. in most cases, the partner will not transfer clients during this period. in order to avoid such conflicts, you may need to lock in the retirement amount a few years before the transition period so the partner will transfer the client base in a timely manner.<\/p>\n early retirement<\/strong><\/p>\n i don\u2019t know if i am correct, but i discourage smaller firms from allowing partners to retire too early. i believe it can be detrimental to a firm to lose the intellectual capital, the relationships and the referral sources that a partner brings.<\/p>\n in addition, early retirement can impose a financial burden on the firm. if a partner is fully vested in retirement benefits after 10 or 15 years of service, that partner might be able to retire at 50 or 55. to avoid this problem, either defer the payment of retirement benefits until age 60 or have early retirement trigger a \u201cclawback\u201d that drastically reduces the retirement benefits.<\/p>\n client transition<\/strong><\/p>\n partner retirement and client transition should go hand in hand. hence, partners who fail to transition all or part of their client base should have some portion of their retirement benefits reduced or held back. client transition is rarely a fast process; it can take two or three years if the process is effective and done correctly. in addition, the transition process becomes more complicated with larger clients when actual client involvement in the process becomes critical. (see the box below for the activities the firm needs to undertake during client transition.)<\/p>\n compensating retired partners<\/strong><\/p>\n often, retired partners will continue to do work for the firm. again, it should be up to the firm to determine what the work will be and how the partner will be compensated. there are three ways to do this:<\/p>\n partner retirement, calculations and benefits<\/strong><\/p>\n many firms are moving from deferred compensation benefits that are based on equity to a multiple of compensation (i.e., somewhere between two and four times). as smaller firms have grown over the last 20 or 30 years, partners with a large equity position have tended to have an exorbitant retirement benefit. for example, your cpa firm started 25 years ago and partner y holds 25 percent equity. the firm is now $10,000,000 and partner y is expecting $2,500,000 paid over five years. the firm has never reviewed its agreement. although the firm has good profits (i.e., 34 percent or $3,400,000), it is now forced to pay out almost 15 percent of its profits to one partner for the next five years. if the firm based its retirement benefit on a multiple of compensation (i.e., three times) and partner y\u2019s average compensation was $650,000 per year, the firm would have a liability of $1,950,000. the key is to review the retirement formula to make sure the firm can afford it.<\/p>\n in addition to the deferred compensation benefits, firms will pay out the partner\u2019s accrual basis capital account over a five-year period. while deferred compensation payments should not carry an interest faction, the capital account payments do.<\/p>\n other retirement benefits may include a continuation of health care benefits, an office with administrative support or even a small monthly payment after the deferred compensation payment has been made.<\/p>\n don\u2019t be like the ostrich that sticks its head in the sand hoping that the problem will go away. i can assure you that developing a retirement policy will be an emotional event in the firm. each partner \u2013 based on age and personal financial position \u2013 will wonder, \u201chow is this going to affect me?\u201d however, if you are sincerely interested in planning for the firm\u2019s future, this is one area that cannot be ignored. by doing it now, you will enhance the value of the firm and the likelihood that it will remain strong and independent.<\/p>\n retiring partners can be great ambassadors for the firm. treat them right. some day you will become one too.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\nwhat makes a great partnership<\/i><\/a><\/p>\n
\nexclusively for pro members. <\/span><\/strong>log in here<\/a> or 2022世界杯足球排名 today<\/a>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
\nover the past 12 months, i have been speaking with firm leaders about leadership in general and succession planning. although there isn\u2019t just one way to structure a successful retirement plan, there are basic elements that need to be incorporated. and, while you may have some of the following items included in your partnership agreement, it is important to have a clearly articulated retirement policy in place.<\/p>\nwhat\u2019s in your retirement plan?<\/h3>\n
\n
final thoughts<\/h3>\n