19 surprises when merging up

man woman handshake shake hands istock_000010387373smallbonus checklist: what smaller firms need to know.

by marc rosenberg

the degree to which merger terms are negotiable is often determined by the relative size of the two firms.

more on mergers: mergers: assessing compatibility | what to discuss at the first merger negotiation meeting | case studies reveal potential loi issues | merger prep: getting to know you | one times fees is a steal! | 13 ways to screw up a merger

generally, the larger the gap in firm size between buyer and seller, the fewer the items are open to negotiation. this can be illustrated by the following chart:
read more →

what challenges really mean for partners

stylized photo of businessman running on a track

the 3 challenges on the road to partnership.

by martin bissett

passport to partnership

now we move on to our sixth “c”  challenges.

again the heading has more than a single application, which we’ll explore here.

more on the passport to partnership: 6 keys to the perfect proposal | how to read your firm’s cultural blueprint | 12 ways to determine your competence | passport to partnership: new research shows wide gap between partners and partners-to-be

ultimately, the partners interviewed in our research broke “challenges” down into two key areas:
read more →

3 factors that always affect negotiations

hand drawing a rainbow-colored 3bonus checklists: smaller firm to larger, 25 questions to ask and 17 data points to request.

by marc rosenberg
cpa firm mergers: your complete guide

there are always three intangible factors that greatly influence the extent to which merger terms and issues are negotiable:

more on mergers: what to discuss at the first merger negotiation meeting | 14 provisions to include in a letter of intent | want to merge? ask for data | one times fees is a steal! | looking to grow your firm? how to find a seller in four steps | 15 can’t-skip merger terms to decide | 14 keys to a successful merger

1. negotiation ability of each firm. some people are “tough” negotiators, continuously trying to impose their will on the merger partner, while others are more malleable and tend to go along with whatever the other side wants.
read more →

what do your true colors say about your commitment?

the word "commitment" in letter blocks with four tiny businessmenbonus checklist: 5 questions for self-evaluation.

by martin bissett
passport to partnership

there’s no doubt that consistent commitment is not as widely practiced as current partners of accounting firms might like to think.

more on the passport to partnership: commitment: your view and your firm’s | what commitment really means for partners | businesses place value on expertise | how well do you represent your firm? | 6 keys to the perfect proposal | what communication really means for partners

business success is built on a dedicated team with a shared vision giving their all for the realization of that vision and the development of the next one.
read more →

13 questions to assess an upward merger

puzzle arrow dollar photobonus checklist: 13 ways to make your firm an attractive candidate.

by marc rosenberg
cpa firm mergers: your complete guide

the smaller firm in a proposed merger should make an objective, realistic assessment as to whether or not merging upward is a good business decision.

more on mergers: mergers: assessing compatibility | what to discuss at the first merger negotiation meeting | 14 provisions to include in a letter of intent | case studies reveal potential loi issues | want to merge? ask for data | merger prep: getting to know you | the merger process in 21 steps | looking to grow your firm? how to find a seller in four steps | 13 reasons accounting firms merge | mergers 101: when negotiations aren’t really negotiations | 5 steps to take before merging

every small firm evaluating the feasibility of merging should consider these questions in as much depth as possible:

read more →

commitment: a cautionary tale for partners-to-be

profile of woman with finger on her lips in "shush" gesturethere are times to chime in and times to stay silent.

by martin bissett
passport to partnership

ask yourself and answer these questions when considering the current and future “commitment” behaviors that you’ll employ.

more on the passport to partnership: commitment: your view and your firm’s | how to build your pipeline | how well do you represent your firm? | 6 keys to the perfect proposal | communication: putting it all together | how to read your firm’s cultural blueprint

1 – what is my first reaction to being asked to work outside of my normal hours?

read more →

dealing with the 16 reasons merging up causes anxiety

businessman with head in hands

bonus checklist: 12 benefits.

by marc rosenberg
cpa firm mergers: your complete guide

while selling to a larger firm may ultimately be the most viable succession plan available to a small firm, the prospect of the merger creates a great deal of anxiety among small firms nonetheless. the larger firm’s sensitivity to these concerns is critical for a successful meeting of the minds during the negotiation phase.

more on mergers: mergers: assessing compatibility | what to discuss at the first merger negotiation meeting | what to ponder before issuing a letter of intent | want to merge? ask for data | merger prep: getting to know you | looking to grow your firm? how to find a seller in four steps | 13 ways to screw up a merger

why small firms are so anxious about merging up
read more →

management styles: partnership vs. corporate

"that's okay i don't know what the chart means either."bonus checklist: 25 best practices for managing partners.

by marc rosenberg
cpa firm retreats

in firm management and governance, we find two distinct management styles: partnership vs. corporate.

partnership style. democracy heavily impacts the way partnerships are governed. in a democracy, every partner has a vote and there is a “majority rules” mentality. a system of checks and balances prevents leaders from becoming dictators. the “citizens” want a reasonable amount of input into decisions.

more on retreats: 30 marketing and growth questions to cover at a retreat | how marketing for cpa firms is different | why create a marketing plan? | thinking of merging? discuss it at a retreat | how to take action after a retreat | 12 simple rules for a retreat | leave your retreat with a to do list | every retreat needs a leader, but who? | retreats are no place for clowns | who should participate in a retreat? | retreat logistics: how long, what kind? | what should cpa firms discuss at retreats? | why do cpa firms conduct retreats?

in a partnership style, partners have “certain inalienable rights” like:
read more →

how much do partners earn? and why

dollar on question markbonus: the 18 factors that drive partner pay.

by marc rosenberg

what do cpa firm partners actually earn?

more on partner compensation: how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

the statistics below usually vary by the size of the population market, though our experience working on numerous client projects with firms in small markets has shown that it is quite possible for firms in small markets to earn “large market” income.

read more →

partner compensation: an art, not a science

the 4 engines that drive management.

by marc rosenberg

the allocation of partner income is much more an art than a science. anyone who thinks otherwise is either naïve or has never been a partner whose income was subjected to an income allocation process.

more on partner compensation: how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

partner compensation is not a science. if allocating partner income were a science, it would be easy to concoct the perfect formula that factors in all relevant performance metrics, both tangible (production) and intangible (leadership, mentoring staff, loyalty, teamwork, etc.), producing results that would be considered fair and acceptable to most or all partners. there would be few arguments among the partners because they would feel the formula says it all and leaves nothing for debate.
read more →

commitment: your view and your firm’s

businessman with hand extended in "no" gestureour experts define the biggest challenge for the next group of leaders.

by martin bissett
passport to partnership

the passport to partnership study collated a number of responses in a conversational style. the need for commitment is showcased below and was repeated many times in various different ways.

so many use us as a stepping stone and we’re now trying to determine who those are at the interview stage.

proof – if any were needed – that long-term commitment is not a given in the next generation of accounting professionals.

more on the passport to partnership: what commitment really means for partners | how to build your pipeline | how well do you represent your firm? | communication: putting it all together | gauge firm culture to move toward partner

one question we ask is: would we want to pass our firm on to someone like this?

read more →

mergers: assessing compatibility

overhead view of people solving a large jigsaw puzzlebonus checklists: 8 questions to answer and 23 issues to negotiate.

by marc rosenberg

these questions can be explored via interviews or group sessions. but they are all great questions that will give insight into each firm’s culture and personality.

more on mergers: what to discuss at the first merger negotiation meeting | 14 provisions to include in a letter of intent | case studies reveal potential loi issues | want to merge? ask for data | the merger process in 21 steps | 13 ways to screw up a merger | 15 can’t-skip merger terms to decide | 14 keys to a successful merger | 13 reasons accounting firms merge | mergers 101: when negotiations aren’t really negotiations | 5 steps to take before merging

  1. why do the firms really want to merge? after the merger, will the firms have the commitment and wherewithal to realize their expectations? acid test: if some of the main reasons for doing the merger are clearly not realized 12 months later, which issues and failures would make you the most upset and frustrated?
  2. how would the new firm be better than the sum of the two individual firms?
  3. do both firms share a similar vision for what the firm should look like in five years? growth, services offered, specialties desired, industries served, number of offices, etc.?
  4. do you share similar values? values include things like how billable a partner should be, how important it is for a partner to follow the rules, the importance of being a business-getter, how staff are treated, work ethic, etc.
  5. each firm should tell the other the following:

read more →