a partnership agreement contains clearly defined terms and conditions of the firm including, but not limited to, each partners’ responsibilities, their pay and their roles within the business. it also includes rules and regulations that are to be followed by the partners in the business. it is essential for a cpa firm to have a partnership agreement, regardless of how collegial and friendly the partners are with each other.
a partnership agreement can prevent potential future disagreements that could occur pertaining to the objectives and responsibilities of the firm.
a number of years ago, i was engaged by the managing partner of a firm to draft their first-ever partnership agreement. the firm had three partners: the 57 year old founder, who was a dominant, rainmaking managing partner, and two other younger partners who performed at a much lower level than the founder. read more →
the right way and many wrong ways that firms handle non-equity partner strategies.
a new analysis of data in the current rosenberg map survey shows that the number of firms adopting non-equity partners is surging. some 78% of firms over $20 million now have non-equity partners, as well as 61% of firms from $10 million to $20 million.
percentage of firms with non-equity partners (rosenberg map survey)
> $20m
$10–20m
$2–10m
all firms
2012-2013 report
78%
61%
39%
46%
2008-2009 report
47%
33%
37%
in this report by marc rosenberg:
a brief history and current status report on the trend.
how the non-equity partner position is commonly used.
how a non-equity partner becomes an equity partner.
why the non-equity partner concept works.
how the non-equity partner concept can fail.
the 11-point comparison: equity vs. non-equity partners defined.
with more firms adopting a compensation committee system to sort out a partnership’s touchiest issues, marc rosenberg provides a 12-item checklist of best practices.
the list covers how to frame the committee’s mandate (“full reign”) to how its decisions should be treated (“no appeals. no approval needed.”). read more →
research shows that managing partners and marketing directors are still facing some major challenges when it comes to getting their firms to implement change. why?
here are four key issues firm leaders today face.
1. getting partners to buy in.
2. creating a firm vision that gets all partners on the same page.
3. helping develop a culture of accountability.
4. being asked to accomplish too many goals.
when the managing partner and the chief marketing officer work together they have a better chance of being successful in these areas. you may ask what do these four factors have to do with the marketing director? and i would answer – everything.
overcoming these four issues will make the firm more competitive, efficient and profitable. here’s how the best managing partners work with their marketing directors: read more →
the genesis of this question comes from one of the most hotly debated issues in cpa firm practice management: is it better for partners to have high or low billable hours?
the purpose of the retreat should be clearly thought out early in the year. articulate one or two goals for the retreat. you need to be very specific as to what you want to accomplish. for example, the purpose of the retreat is to develop a succession plan for the firm. you many not know exactly what it will look like, but you know what the end product of the retreat will be.
if you cannot do this, don’t hold the meeting. ask yourself this one question: “what would happen if we did not hold this retreat?” if the answer is “nothing,” you’ll know what to do.
retreat topic no-no’s
let’s look at common retreat topics that should not be discussed at a retreat. you may or not agree with the list, but i urge you to strike the following items from your retreat agendas. read more →
“i don’t think that the average partner takes accountability seriously,” aquila says. “if they did, they would take their individual goals more seriously and not let their fellow partners down.” read more →
ever wonder about revamping the partner compensation system for your firm? but how to assess partner performance? and how to reward the right things?
a firm’s compensation system is a reflection of its culture and competitive realities, according to august aquila, a regular 卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 contributor and leading practice management consultant.
if it’s been a while since you gave your comp system a checkup, then you might be interested in aquila’s 16-point partner compensation checkup questionnaire to get you thinking about how effective your current compensation plan is:
and five ways how not to implement a system of partner accountability.
august aquila, a veteran practice management consultant, works globally with accounting firms on leadership and management issues. if you’re thinking about the quality of leadership at your firm, think on this.
five wrong ways to make partners more accountable:
let’s make it into a checklist. one thing you can count on – accountants love checklists. it seems that a checklist is the answer to all our problems. read more →
david maister in “strategy and the fat smoker” notes that there are two elements needed in order for us to change. the first is a willingness to do it. the second is determination. but alas, we know the path to hell is paved with good intentions.
there are a multitude of platitudes about change. but unless we change we don’t grow and the skills that got us to where we are, won’t get us to the next level. none of us can achieve more unless we become more. if i fail to change, i will not produce different or better results, but only the same thing. this is extremely dangerous because the world around us – our clients, our employees, the market place continue to change.
take a quick acid test. what do you know today that you did not know five years ago? ten years ago? if your list is short, you haven’t changed much. if your list is long, congratulations! the longer the list, the better.
is there a change process?
the quick answer to the question is yes. read more →