{"id":48819,"date":"2016-06-12t05:00:17","date_gmt":"2016-06-12t09:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=48819"},"modified":"2018-01-01t09:25:25","modified_gmt":"2018-01-01t14:25:25","slug":"how-large-and-small-firms-allocate-income","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2016\/06\/12\/how-large-and-small-firms-allocate-income\/","title":{"rendered":"how large and small firms allocate income"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"dollar<\/a>how many of these 8 criteria does your firm use?<\/strong><\/p>\n

by marc rosenberg<\/span><\/i>
\npartner comp: art & science<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/u><\/p>\n

for purposes of this post, we will group cpa firms according to five different sizes:<\/p>\n

more on partner compensation:<\/b> integrating partner comp with strategic planning<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>|\u00a0<\/span>crash course: operating a compensation committee<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>|\u00a0<\/span>partner pay: open vs. closed compensation systems<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>the 3 best partner compensation formulas<\/a>\u00a0<\/span>|\u00a0<\/span>11 points in designing a partner comp system<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>what partners earn and how they earn it<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>why most partner comp systems are performance-based<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    \n
  1. the big 4. they are the ultimate of sophistication, running their firms as true, colossal corporations, regardless of their legal entity. virtually none of this post\u00a0relates to big 4 firms.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
      \n
    1. the top 100 firms, excluding the big 4. the 100th largest firm was\u00a0$33\u00a0million\u00a0in 2015.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
        \n
      1. multipartner firms from $15\u00a0million to $33\u00a0million.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
          \n
        1. multipartner firms from $5\u00a0million to $15\u00a0million.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
            \n
          1. multipartner firms below $5\u00a0million.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            read more →<\/a><\/p>\n