{"id":48817,"date":"2016-05-29t05:00:50","date_gmt":"2016-05-29t09:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=48817"},"modified":"2017-12-04t09:37:01","modified_gmt":"2017-12-04t14:37:01","slug":"crash-course-operating-a-compensation-committee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2016\/05\/29\/crash-course-operating-a-compensation-committee\/","title":{"rendered":"crash course: operating a compensation committee"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>18 lessons to take to heart. and a few words of warning.<\/strong><\/p>\n by marc rosenberg<\/span><\/i> operating a compensation committee isn’t for the faint of heart. here are points all members would do well to heed.<\/p>\n more on partner compensation:<\/b> 5 other systems for paying partners<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>the 3 best partner compensation formulas<\/span><\/a> |<\/span> 11 points in designing a partner comp system<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>what partners earn and how they earn it<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>how partners view compensation: it\u2019s not all about the money<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>why most partner comp systems are performance-based<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n 1. the partners must understand the heart and soul of the compensation committee (cc) approach: the system can only work if the people being judged are willing to trust the judges. period. if the partners aren\u2019t comfortable with this, they should not use the cc.
\npartner comp: art & science<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/p>\n
\n read more →<\/a><\/p>\n