{"id":47918,"date":"2016-04-20t05:00:10","date_gmt":"2016-04-20t09:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/48e130086c.nxcli.net\/?p=47918"},"modified":"2017-08-21t06:41:41","modified_gmt":"2017-08-21t10:41:41","slug":"13-questions-merger-equals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.g005e.com\/2016\/04\/20\/13-questions-merger-equals\/","title":{"rendered":"13 questions between merger equals"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a>negotiations often are more difficult.<\/strong><\/p>\n by marc rosenberg<\/span><\/i> mergers of equals or firms close to equal (some call these sideways mergers) are much less common than mergers in which there is a clear survivor. but they do occur.<\/p>\n more on mergers:<\/b> merging in smaller: what to ask<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>thinking \u2018downstream\u2019 merger? check these 25 potential problems first<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>20 terms to settle when merging up<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>13 questions to assess an upward merger<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>what to discuss at the first merger negotiation meeting<\/span><\/a> | <\/span>what to ponder before issuing a letter of intent<\/span><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n quite simply, there are two reasons mergers of equals are uncommon:
\ncpa firm mergers: your complete guide<\/span><\/i><\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n read more →<\/a><\/p>\n