pay &amp; compensation

be specific and find ways to “catch” the partner in action.

an example of the process

it’s one thing to say “the managing partner implements strategy,” another to put it into action.

more on performance management: make accountability a process | pay varies when performance varies | accountability is for everyone | who decides what? | firms say what would change retirement pay | action plans for transitioning partners | how retirement issues affect succession planning | how partner ratings factor into equity | develop your employees or suffer the consequences

following is an example of this process, providing more detail to show how it might look in actual practice. let’s assume that one of the goals of a partner is to increase the most trusted business advisor activity for his or her top clients. in the initial goal sheet, for this one goal from the managing partner, that might look like this:
read more →

crash course: operating a compensation committee

may 29, 2016

18 lessons to take to heart. and a few words of warning.

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

operating a compensation committee isn’t for the faint of heart. here are points all members would do well to heed.

more on partner compensation: 5 other systems for paying partners | the 3 best partner compensation formulas | 11 points in designing a partner comp system | what partners earn and how they earn it | how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

1. the partners must understand the heart and soul of the compensation committee (cc) approach: the system can only work if the people being judged are willing to trust the judges. period. if the partners aren’t comfortable with this, they should not use the cc.
read more →

how the best managing partners turn ideas into reality

may 24, 2016

approaches can differ dramatically from one partner to another.

how can the managing partner operationalize the strategy within the policies, process and budget set forth by the partner group?

more on performance management: accountability includes partners | accountability requires clear expectations | base retirement on today’s operations | how involved should retired owners be? | how to find a partner’s replacement | best practices for mandatory retirement | 7 succession questions to ignore for now

to keep this simple, because it can get very complex extremely fast, let’s say that the firm has three strategies the partner group has mandated:
read more →

partner pay: recapping the compensation systems

may 22, 2016

the popularity, pros, and cons of each.

chart of compensation system usage — compensation systems in use, by size of partnership

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

what is the actual usage of compensation by firms?

more on partner compensation:5 other systems for paying partners | 3 non-performance-based comp systems | the 3 best partner compensation formulas |why firms use partner comp formulas|3 subjective compensation systems|11 points in designing a partner comp system | 3 tiers of compensation | partner compensation 101|what partners earn and how they earn it | partner compensation: an art, not a science | how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

exclusively for pro members. log in here or 2022世界杯足球排名 today.

observations & analysis:

managing the managing partner

may 17, 2016

checks and balances are key.

as past success and personal development continuously demonstrate, organizations operate more effectively when people are managed. and since partners are people, rather than gods or superheroes, it makes sense that we put something in place to manage them as well.

more on performance management: accountability is for everyone | succession plan requirements | base retirement on today’s operations | how involved should retired owners be? | firms say what would change retirement pay | 4 ways to create more capacity | 7 succession questions to ignore for now | how partner ratings factor into equity | hazards of not reallocating equity | 5 harmful management attitudes (and how to fix them) | do cpa firms need management or leadership? | job 1 for the practice owner: client management

with this general background in mind, let’s dive a little deeper into how a managing partner goal-setting process might work.
read more →

partner pay: why your book of business isn’t worth as much

may 15, 2016

four reasons behind the decline. plus the impact on buyouts and retirements.

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

i’m sure many people see the title of this post as a form of practice management heresy.

more on partner compensation: 5 other systems for paying partners | 3 non-performance-based comp systems | 3 subjective compensation systems | partner compensation 101 | what partners earn and how they earn it | partner compensation: an art, not a science | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

the message is: the weighting of book of business is trending from being the “end-all” in allocating partner income, or close to it, to a factor that is still important, but less so.
read more →

how to decide who decides pay

may 10, 2016

where to draw the line between managing partner and compensation committee.

everyone likes the idea that “i” will hold “me” accountable. but few like the idea of “anyone else” holding “them” accountable.

more on performance management: accountability requires clear expectations | base retirement on today’s operations | who decides what? | how retired partners are robbing their own firms | best practices for mandatory retirement | how retirement issues affect succession planning | succession: the questions to care about | how to target what skills to develop now | what having your employees’ backs means | 5 harmful management attitudes (and how to fix them) | do cpa firms need management or leadership? | job 1 for the practice owner: client management

exclusively for pro members. log in here or 2022世界杯足球排名 today.

so, once the decision has been made to implement systemic changes to hold partners accountable to specific performance expectations rather than just relying on everyone to put in a self-proclaimed “good day’s work,” the next battleground is determining who will be holding whom accountable. the discussion always shifts to “let’s have a group of people, like a compensation committee, hold us accountable.”
read more →

partner pay: open vs. closed compensation systems

may 8, 2016

both have advantages.

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

“if people are concerned about their absolute level of compensation, then they can be satisfied. however, if their focus is on relative standing, then they can never be satisfied.”

– andrew grove, former chairman, intel

an open compensation system is one in which all partners know the earnings of all partners.

more on partner compensation: 5 other systems for paying partners | 3 non-performance-based comp systems | 3 subjective compensation systems | partner compensation 101 | how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

a closed system is one in which a limited number of partners are privy to this information. in closed systems, the only partners with access to all partners’ income are usually the managing partner, the compensation committee and/or the executive committee.
read more →

make accountability a process

may 3, 2016

everyone performs better when someone else has oversight.

by bill reeb and dominic cingoranelli
卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 / succession institute

setting up an “accountability and goal process” always sounds much easier than it actually is to implement. so for those who already think this process would be painful, just know that you still are probably underestimating the amount of agony in store.

more on performance management: accountability requires clear expectations | accountability is for everyone | succession plan requirements | base retirement on today’s operations | who decides what? | how retired partners are robbing their own firms | how involved should retired owners be? | firms say what would change retirement pay | 4 ways to create more capacity | how to find a partner’s replacement | action plans for transitioning partners | partner retirement and the war for clients | best practices for mandatory retirement | how retirement issues affect succession planning | succession: the questions to care about

this leads us to the standard question, “if this is so awful, why would anyone do it?” the answer is both simple and abstract.
read more →

5 other systems for paying partners

may 1, 2016

why balanced scorecard is mbo in new clothing.

by marc rosenberg
partner comp: art & science

there are many partner compensation formulas, some performance-based and some not, some more subjective than others.

more on partner compensation: 3 non-performance-based comp systems | the 3 best partner compensation formulas | 11 points in designing a partner comp system | what partners earn and how they earn it | partner compensation: an art, not a science | how partners view compensation: it’s not all about the money | why most partner comp systems are performance-based

the systems below are less common than others, but some firms are attracted to them, especially small firms.
read more →

pay varies when performance varies

april 26, 2016

plus ways to measure both objective and subjective performance criteria (yes, it can be done).

by bill reeb and dominic cingoranelli
卡塔尔世界杯常规比赛时间 / succession institute

an important point to keep in mind is that we, as human beings, have good months and bad ones, good years and bad ones.

more on performance management: accountability requires clear expectations | accountability is for everyone | succession plan requirements | base retirement on today’s operations | who decides what? | how retired partners are robbing their own firms | how involved should retired owners be? | firms say what would change retirement pay

what is going on in our personal lives has a lot to do with how we perform in our professional ones. therefore, if someone is going through a difficult time, such as a divorce, death in the family, major conflicts with extended family, etc., we can expect those events to spill over into our work life.
read more →

3 non-performance-based comp systems

april 24, 2016