training? cpe? they’re not the same
the three types of training needed and 21 best practices for providing it.
by marc rosenberg
cpa firm staff: managing your #1 asset
“training is everything. the peach was once a bitter almond; cauliflower is nothing but cabbage with an education.” – mark twain
more: six tips for setting compensation | staff crave advancement and challenge | what leadership looks and feels at cpa firms | eleven things that good mentors do | give the recognition your staff needs | the importance of great bosses | how remote work is impacting accounting firms | make work flexibility work for everyone | why staff leave cpa firms … and how to stop them | how to solve the big disconnect in talent management | what relevance means for staffing in accounting | how accounting staffing has changed
exclusively for pro members. log in here or 2022世界杯足球排名 today.
we cringe when cpas use “training” and “cpe” synonymously.
- cpe coursework is often reactive, taken to maintain a cpa license. it may or may not educate. it may or may not be the type of education an individual needs. many cpas look upon cpe as a nuisance that is necessary to comply with professional regulations. the smaller the firm and the older the cpa, the more likely this is the case.
- training is primarily proactive, undertaken voluntarily to expand a person’s knowledge, performance and capabilities. the training aligns with what the person needs to do the job and provide value to the firm and its clients.
ideally, the training identified as needed also qualifies as cpe.
read more →