nine reasons not to specialize

young black woman sitting in front of laptop looking thoughtful

think about what you really want.

by ed mendlowitz
202 questions and answers: managing an accounting practice

question: can you recommend a specialty i can get involved in to generate more revenue for my practice?

more: when board service gets tricky | yes, you have to share work papers | should you merge? here’s how to chart your path | hold staff accountable if you want them to listen to you | how to raise your rates | higher fees to start: ten ways to make your tax season better | three ways to start an accounting practice | free consultation? not always | referral fee? forget it | how much is your tax practice worth?
goprocpa.comexclusively for pro members. log in here or 2022世界杯足球排名 today.

 

response: my discussion with the cpa indicated that his practice consisted of a large individual tax return practice and many monthly business clients. he thought financial planning or business valuations would be a way to expand his services and make more money. it did not seem he had an intellectual interest in these areas.

i told him to spend the time getting more business clients similar to what he had. my reasons were:

  1. he wasn’t interested in personal growth – just wanted to make more money.
  2. both specialties he mentioned required obtaining designations that would require study and time – an investment he didn’t want to make. i told him there was no pill he could take that would make him instantly adept in fp or bv, but if i heard of one, i would certainly let him know.
  3. he did not seem to have an awareness of the scope of the specialties he mentioned. for instance, fp could include asset allocation assistance, budgeting consulting, retirement, education funding, estate or succession planning – all different specialties requiring different types of knowledge and training, and staffing. bv could include estate and gift valuations, buying a business analysis, due diligence, divorce valuations and forensic investigations.
  4. he actually has a very good practice – whenever he got a new business client his “annuity” income increased and went on and on and on. getting a check every month is a pretty great business model.
  5. fp or bv specialty work would require a large amount of his time. his present clients are primarily serviced by staff. he has about three or four meetings a year with each client. his time including client meetings and calls, supervision, training and review was about 25 percent of the total time servicing the client. he was using leverage and delegating work very effectively. if he went to the next level and invested in another staff person, he could probably reduce his time and possibly use the freed-up time to cross-sell clients some business advisory or consulting services (which is a specialty he should further inquire about). he could also examine his client base to see if he has a preponderance of clients in an industry, positioning himself as an “expert” and using that to perform additional services and in marketing for new clients.
  6. fp and bv work are primarily one-shot assignments. unless you sell product or manage money, the cost of getting new clients has to be covered by the work generated, which is very difficult without a critical mass of continual work being referred to him. with his present model, the acquisition cost is spread out over a period of time because the revenue stream from the client lasts for quite a while (many years based on his track record).
  7. he did not have a critical mass of contacts to feed him fp or bv work and developing it would take “years” and substantial time and cost on his part.
  8. in fp and bv niches, he would need to demonstrate an expertise such as writing articles or teaching cpe, which also would require large blocks of time.
  9. his income was above average for the size practice he had. he also had quite a bit of time off in the summer and toward the end of the year. he indicated no interest in working harder – he said he wanted to work smarter on higher-fee services. i told him that while he would receive higher hourly rates on the bv work, much of that work is time-sensitive, causing rushed conditions, making it more difficult to schedule around his other commitments. if the bv expanded into forensic work, a lot of his time would be at the command of the attorneys he would be working with.

sometimes, it’s better to stick to your knitting.

3 responses to “nine reasons not to specialize”

  1. martin eisenstein

    this is a great article with great comments.

    ed i like how your analysis pointed at the value of the monthly repeatable revenue from the business clients. as we know, the tax practice for individuals creates revenue opportunities separately, but isn’t as great for exit.

    while this kind of accountant doesn’t need to become a specialist in business valuation were financial planning and analysis, having a basic understanding of how these tools work and who can supply them makes the account a referral partner of great value for the role-playing professional and is in a much better position for service that small to medium monthly client. the more you know, the better in advisor you are, without having to run a practice in that area.

  2. joey havens

    ed, as always, you bring much experience and wisdom to share. these nine reasons for supporting the status quo offer so many great insights. many of your insights are overlooked by firms as they work on strategy. however, i would caution anyone who reads this to be very careful as they map out their firm strategy. what is not listed here are the risks associated with the status quo. if your practitioner is 60+, i can see this path, although i feel empathy for his team members on a short-run course. for anyone else, there are more than 9 reasons to question the status quo.

    questions to be asked for consideration include: what are the risks of retaining and securing talent in the future as the talent pool sees these opportunities very differently today? how sustainable is the business model if more progressive firms show up with significantly more insights and services? how sustainable is some of the revenue stream as more aspects of the practice are automated, including tax preparation and even tax research? what are other ways to specialize and bring significant value without getting new certifications? what are avenues for growth that provide opportunities for your team and provide for a stronger relationship with your clients? how are you addressing the business risk of baby boomer retirements and so many small business owners transitioning out of ownership? what investments will need to be made in the next 24 months to automate and transform the client experience? how does the status quo affect the long-term value of the firm if it wants to sell or be acquired at some point? what is the increased profit potential if he expands services and how can that help increase compensation for team members for sustainability? nine questions that anyone should consider when they choose the status quo. thanks j

    • frank stitely

      you make some very valid points about the future. if i were in the owner’s shoes, i would consider offering more in-depth advisory services to his business client base rather than specializing in something in which he has little interest like valuation or financial planning. small businesses need and want lots of advice. all you have to do is ask them, and they will tell you. the additional business revenue builds value in the practice for an exit.