by domenick j. esposito
8 steps to great
it never ceases to amaze me how lax many small and midsized cpa firms are when it comes to managing their work-in-process and accounts receivable and optimizing their cash flows.
more on strategic planning: profitability requires discipline | the link between strategy and winning on value | focus on an enhanced client experience | solve the partner comp problem | 6 rocks in the path to growth | use compensation to shape partner behavior | the importance of m&a culture due diligence
exclusively for pro members. log in here or 2022世界杯足球排名 today.
sloppy billing and collecting policies often result in lost billing opportunities (i.e., if you don’t bill it timely, clients forget the value you provided and resist receiving a bill 90 days after the work was performed) and for a need to have a relatively large line of credit. sloppy policies also result in year-end fire drills with clients when partners “beg” clients for cash before the end of the firm’s fiscal year end.
i often wonder what clients must think of their cpa firm if the partner, year in and year out, is lax about billing and collecting until the calendar hits dec. 31. bet they don’t think that you are a very good businessperson.
not quite sure i know why sloppy billing and collecting policies are tolerated at so many firms but my sense is that many firms lack the leadership, discipline and accountability to drive improved performance. particularly at the larger firms, my sense is that many partners view themselves as employees (not partners) and don’t take a real interest in improving firm performance. after all, what’s in it for them?
having said that, this malaise can be effectively dealt with and work-in-process and accounts receivable performance can be dramatically improved. it requires persistence and consistency by the firm’s leadership and the ability to pull the trigger when dealing with noncompliant partners.
presented below is an example of how one firm has addressed its quest for better receivables management:
- this firm instituted a policy that requires as close to $0 investment in unbilled time as possible. this requires that every month, time on each client be either billed or written off (or some combination thereof). exceptions to firm policy will be granted when circumstances make sense to do so.
- this firm instituted a policy that requires that all accounts receivable be collected within 60 days of billing. again, exceptions to firm policy will be granted when circumstances make sense to do so.
- if a partner is unable to substantially comply with the billing and collecting policies as outlined above, that partner will meet with the firm’s managing partner (or his/her designee) to explain why compliance isn’t being achieved. sometimes the explanation can make sense but in many cases the explanation is an excuse for not trying. if the partner is a repeat offender of these policies (and the reasons for noncompliance are unacceptable), the firm withholds that partner’s monthly draw until the noncompliance is corrected. by the way, we have observed that a noncompliant partner usually modifies behavior for a few months but can easily fall back into unacceptable behavior if not carefully monitored.
the proof is in the pudding. at this particular firm, performance improved dramatically. work in process amounts over 60 days old have dropped by 25 percent and accounts receivable amounts over 60 days old have dropped by about 20 percent. on top of that, the firm’s dependence on a sizeable line of credit has diminished considerably. all good. and by the way, once the word gets out that firm leadership is serious about compliance with billing and collecting policies, the partner group generally pays attention and behavior changes take place throughout the partnership.
i am referring to one particular firm because it is a stellar performer when it comes to billing and collecting. there are many other firms that have adopted similar policies and they also have seen the fruit of their labors. so, it can be done if one has the conviction to improve.
now you may say that you can never implement policies that are similar to those outlined above. as an example, your tax-only clients are used to paying you what is owed after the tax returns have been delivered and some of your more substantial attest clients are traditionally slow payers. “things can never change with those clients and we are afraid that if we pushed too hard, these clients will shop their work to a different cpa firm.” these are merely excuses.
the world of business has changed. there is little doubt that your best clients themselves have tightened up their own billing and collecting policies. you lose nothing by going to existing clients and telling them that your firm needs to tighten up billing and collecting. see what comes back to you.
some existing clients will balk and perhaps those clients are understandable exceptions to your new policies. some others may balk and their inability to improve may be a good reason for you to exit from those client relationships. i have observed, however, that many existing clients will understand your logic and not balk. many will do their best to comply with your new policies.
moving forward, all your new clients will be told about your tighter billing and collecting policies up front as your relationship with them begins. compliance by new clients is considerably easier than compliance by existing clients. they have not been spoiled by your previous lax practices.
often cpa firm partners forget that their firm is a business. it has to run as a business. profits and cash flow are the lifeblood to any firm. yet, performance is nowhere where it needs to be.
i encourage you to take a hard look at your receivables management. i am guessing that there is considerable room for improvement. if i am correct, tighten up your policies. if your partners see that this is important to you, it will become more important to them.
compliance with policies is contagious. partners want to win but need to know that the firm’s leadership is applying tighter policies in a consistent manner. most important, they need to see that the firm’s leadership is prepared to pull the trigger when noncompliance is inexcusable.