do you have the right mix of partners?
by domenick j. esposito
8 steps to great
visualize your partner group fitting into a bell curve.
more on strategic planning: ai likely to accelerate merger mania | what a value proposition truly is (and isn’t) | does your firm need an independent executive committee member? | 10 ways to link compensation and strategy | develop home-grown future leaders | how to capitalize on the trusted business advisor opportunity | leadership must be persistent and consistent
exclusively for pro members. log in here or 2022世界杯足球排名 today.
in quartile #1, you have the stallions – the very high performers who produce outstanding contributions to the firm year in and year out. these equity partners want to win and know how to do it.
there isn’t much that you need to do to move the needle with them. they consistently contribute to the partnership with exceptional performances. their contributions might be in maintaining excellent client relationships, consistent new business development in excess of $250,000 a year, mentoring younger staff or firm administration. these are the partners who get the large year-end bonuses and generally are the firm’s highest earners.
in quartile #2, you have the solid performers – while these partners may not be stallions, per se, they are reliable team players who do their best and are sincere in furthering the success of the firm. more than likely these partners are a combination of seasoned equity partners and a number of up-and-coming nonequity partners. they are worth every penny that they get in compensation.
in quartile #3, you have the journeymen – every firm has them. these partners give you a solid performance and do what they can to further the firm but generally act, look and feel like employees and not owners of the business. they usually aren’t the lead partners on client relationships because they are not effective and only occasionally bring in some new business.
in quartile #4, you have partners who are always on the bubble because they are poor performers for a whole myriad of different reasons. some no longer have gas in the tanks. some never had gas in their tanks and probably should not have been promoted to partner in the first place. nevertheless, they are partners. some have been with the firm for a very long time and it is difficult to deliver the message that they are probably better off seeking different employment. waiting to deliver tough love later rather than sooner usually isn’t a good thing and more than likely makes a bad situation even worse.
“people don’t do what you expect but what you inspect.” – lou gerstner
every cpa firm needs more than 50 percent of its partners in quartiles #1 and #2. if your firm doesn’t, there is work that needs to be done before you can realize the firm’s full potential. this is particularly true if your firm has more than 50 percent of the partner group in quartiles #3 and #4. if your firm has the wrong mix of partners, i strongly suggest that you start changing that mix sooner rather than later.
while you’re changing your partner mix, there is a tool that you can utilize to get greater results than those you might be currently experiencing. that tool is your partner compensation plan.
as i consult with small and mid-sized cpa firms across the u.s., i am surprised to find that many firms don’t have a partner compensation plan that rewards desired behaviors that can move the firm’s bottom line. if your partner compensation plan:
- rewards an eat what you kill environment, you aren’t building a firm that can remain independent in the long run.
- sprinkles the bonus pool to quartile #4 partners, you aren’t paying your top performers their market value.
- is heavily weighted to partner billable hours as opposed to total billable hours managed or supervised, you aren’t giving your younger staff the opportunity to get on-the-job training that will help develop them.
- rewards a partner who thinks and acts as if clients are his or her clients as opposed to the firm’s clients, you aren’t building a firm with a lot of fabric among the partner group.
- doesn’t promote the use of your firm’s specialists to service clients who require unique services such as international tax or estate planning, you aren’t looking out for the best interest of the clients. sooner or later these clients will discover that they have outgrown your firm and will begin to look for a new service provider.
- results in an open compensation system with full disclosure to all partners, you are asking for unnecessary trouble within your partner ranks.
- doesn’t include the ability to have upward partner evaluations, you are inviting potential staff abuses.
- doesn’t require timely staff evaluations, you are creating an environment for unnecessary staff turnover.
- tolerates poor client billing and collecting habits, you are telling compliant partners that you aren’t serious about the firm’s stated policies regarding timely work in progress billings and timely client receipts.
- rewards cowboys or partners who don’t abide by firm protocols, you are risking losing some very high performers who don’t respect leadership who do not walk the talk.
there is no perfect partner compensation plan and, even if there were, not all of your partners would modify their behaviors that will move the firm’s needle and maximize their compensation. if your partner compensation plan doesn’t address these and other critical success factors, you probably aren’t properly rewarding the necessary behaviors that will enable you to compete in the future.
a partner compensation plan is one of your most effective management tools and yet many firms don’t maximize its usefulness. when is the last time you took a critical look at your firm’s compensation plan? how often do you say to yourself that your partners aren’t thinking and acting like owners of the business? it might be time to ask your best partners for their recommendations on how to improve your compensation design and what needs to be done to make it become an integral part of your arsenal to improve the bottom line.