you might have thought this was settled in the 1990’s.
but oklahoma remains one of six states left in the u.s. that still (technically, at least) bans non-cpas from owning a piece of a cpa firm.
today the oklahoma society of cpas will be emailing a survey to members to see if they want to bring their state’s rules into the mainstream. in a straw poll of directors and committee chairs, 40 out of 45 voted in favor of lifting the ban.
under the proposed change:
- a majority of the ownership of any cpa firm must be cpas.
- non-cpa owners must be active participants in the firm; passive ownership is not permitted.
- a licensed cpa must be designated and identified to the state board as the individual responsible for registration of the firm.
- the partner/owner in charge of attest services must be a licensed cpa.
the state society says small to mid-sized firms will benefit from the change because it will allow them to “increase the scope of services to their clients” and “offer attractive partnership positions to non-cpa specialists in areas such as information technology or estate planning.”
but it’s always been the small and mid-sized firms who have traditionally opposed opening up cpa firms to non-cpas, fearing larger firms were more able to take advantage of the strategy.
only alaska, hawaii, new york, connecticut and delaware remain in oklahoma’s camp.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/205fb/205fbbe6d4b897bd97a53bbf527cdf79605cf641" alt="us map non-cpa ownership 2009 source: oscpa"
one response to “oklahoma cpas start voting today on non-cpa ownership”
kathy fox
i think we should allow non-cpas to be minority owners in a cpa firm.