cpas to boomers: “save, save… and save!”

are boomers ready for retirement? probably not.

are you ready for busy season? sound off here.

by rick telberg

we sure hit a hot issue with our recent survey on baby boomers and their plans for… or maybe we should say dreams of… retirement.

respondents agreed—or at least 92 percent of them did—that america’s boomers are not financially prepared for retirement. they’re saving too little. they’re imagining their retirement won’t last long (to put it nicely). and unless they start shoveling money into their iras and 401ks, “retirement in the golden years” is going to look more like “working in the fading light of sunset.”

so we asked cpas and other financial types what they thought aging boomers should be doing to get ready for retirement.

and, so far, we’ve received 746 pieces of advice, most of which boiled down to “save more.”

“save at least 10 percent of income annually,” said one.

“save 20 percent of earnings,” said another.

“save 25 percent of pay, now until retirement; only draw 4 percent of savings or less to live on during retirement,” said another.

advice regarding social security was 99 percent consistent: don’t count on it; don’t calculate it into projected income. just one anonymous advisor saw hope, saying, “congress will get it fixed. no one ever expected to go to the millionaire’s mansion on ss.”

most other advice was consistent, too, and grace b. ghezzi, vice president of benefit consulting group, inc., in north syracuse, n.y., summed it all up most solidly: “save more, max retirement contributions to 401(k)s and iras and minimize debt.”

sole proprietor edward greenlee, in ruidoso, n.m., offered the same advice but added a couple other good ideas: establish a line of credit for contingencies and have enough liquid cash available to meet six months’ worth of expenses.

hal s. hershgordon, jd, cpa, president of ybi trusted financial advisors, inc., in maple glen, pa., recommended a healthy level of pessimism. “obtain and maintain adequate insurance coverage, i.e., health, disability, liability,” he wrote. “save until it hurts, then invest to address longevity risk.”

what to invest in, of course, is the advice we all need, but no one recommended specific stocks, bonds, or funds most likely to carry boomers through retirement. the closest thing to a recommendation came from brooke salvini, principal of salvini financial planning, of san luis obispo, calif. “hire a fee-only financial planner to receive objective professional advice,” she wrote, and admitted that she’s biased on the issue of “fee-only.”

kenneth j. peters, mst, cpa, cfe, a partner with peters & woodring, llc cpas, of owings mills, md., was also a little pessimistic. “don’t count on the government,” he wrote, and added, “do not anticipate that up-and-comers will be able to afford to buy your present home when you retire.”

i thought jim eckelkamp, president of eckelkamp & associates, cpas, of st. louis, mo., gave us a good piece of his mind.

“plan on working at least part time beyond 65 and try to build your career so you can do what you enjoy and aren’t working at 70 at mcdonald’s,” he said. “if we are going to live to 90 and beyond and are still in school until 22, is it realistic to think only 43 years of working can support 47 years of not working? our ancestors didn’t live that long after retirement and started their careers much younger.”

i don’t know what scares me more—withering away in a nursing home with a big pile of cash under my mattress or trying to flip burgers at the age of 96. i guess i should be happy to be doing anything at the age of 96. whatever it is, i just hope it involves a big pile of cash.

[copyright 2008 bay street group llc. used by permission all rights reserved. first published by the aicpa]

5 responses to “cpas to boomers: “save, save… and save!””

  1. rick telberg

    thanks for the question. it was, indeed, left a little unclear. but i think most people were answering per person, not per household.
    — rick

  2. kristen l

    great article. on the advice, was it 20% for each person or per household that was the recommended amount to be saved?

    kristen l

  3. william n. brocato, cpa, cma

    i think jim eckelkamp had it wrong – we don’t work 43 years to support 47 years of not working. at least the first 18 years of life are usually supported by someone else, and for the lucky ones another 4+ years on top of that.

    so really, people are planning on working 43 years to support 25 years of not working – unless you have some strange contract where you have to repay your guardians for your upbringing!

    william n. brocato, cpa, cma
    partner | chief financial officer

  4. paul d. weinberg, cpa, ca

    the whole concept of “saving for retirement” is misguided, and impossible for most americans.

    more, you should concentrate on telling people to build value in their businesses, or if they are employees, to stress continuing education, so they can keep earning a living.

    it amazes me that the media keeps writing articles about how “boomers” haven’t saved enough for retirement. as an example, i have three kids, two of which are girls, college and weddings alone will run close to $1 million, and that’s after tax money!

    telling people to save so they can retire is absurd… this is 2008, not 1948.

    paul weinberg, successful cpa for over 20 years.

    paul d. weinberg, cpa, ca
    partner
    demarco, kinnaman, lewis & co.
    lincolnshire, illinois

  5. mary in missouri

    rick,

    you have hit the nail on the head again. you put together the best information!