step 1: don’t delay.
cpas assess the baby boomer market. join the study; get the benchmarks.
by rick telberg
it’s funny how cpas can go to a client and discuss the intimacies of life and death, children and parents, bank accounts and bankruptcy, but when it comes time to talk about fees, the topic is buried, breezed over, or brushed off.
it’s easy to understand why. the cpa financial planner is there to talk about making money, not spending it. the focus is on helping the client, not funding the financial planner. the fee almost feels like an insignificant afterthought, a voluntary tip for service well rendered or a topic too mercenary to talk about.
both parties understand, of course, that this service, like everything else good in life, isn’t free. somewhere, somehow, the cpa financial planner gets paid. that payment can amount to quite a bit of money, and it isn’t necessarily tied to performance. depending on the fee structure, the cpa financial planner who guides a client to wealth may earn as much as the one who barely helps a client tread water.
clients are naturally nervous about this, but they’re probably most nervous when they don’t understand what fees they’re paying. they tend to fear an expensive surprise, and they’re often confused about how the cpa financial planner figures out the fee. when it’s bundled with a variety of products, it gets not only more complicated but also less comparable with the fees of other financial planners.
don’t overestimate the client’s ability to understand your fee structure. focus group research conducted by state street global advisors reveals that financial advisers very often think the client understands the fee structure, but the truth is that very few clients really do understand it
primarily, this is a matter of trust, which is by far the most important characteristic that clients look for in financial planners.
secondarily, this is a matter of clarity. the same study found that clients are less concerned about the absolute fee than about understanding what the fee is. fast-talk turns them off more quickly than issues of commission.
thirdly, of course, it’s the fee itself. the smart client will compare it with those of other financial planners. smarter clients will want to know what they’re getting for their money.
these three issues all say the same thing: talk about fees with your client.
dr. james grubman, a psychologist and consultant on wealth management for high income families, has had success with a four-step procedure for talking about fees:
1. don’t procrastinate. fees aren’t necessarily the first thing you want to talk about, but plan the moment when you will bring it up, and then do it without fail.
2. present the fee structure clearly. this is easier if the structure is simple. clients don’t want to grapple with shades of gray. don’t muddle the issue with discussion of what other clients have to pay or what your client might have to pay. complex structures designed to keep things fair are less effective than structures that are easy to understand. keep it simple. explain it. move on.
3. put your fees in context. provide a chart comparing your fees with your competitors’. this might be a good time to explain what you’re delivering for the fee.
4. put it in writing. don’t let somebody’s bad memory create a nasty surprise. and don’t put it in small print or legalese. make it clear that you’re not hiding anything.
in short, don’t be afraid to talk about fees. use it as an opportunity to build trust. if you’re open, honest, specific and unapologetic, your clients will trust you, and that trust is the support system of a productive and long-term relationship.
your turn: cpas assess the baby boomer market. join the study; get the answers.
[copyright © 2007 bay street group llc. all rights reserved. used by permission. first published by the aicpa.]
one response to “4 steps to getting the fees you deserve”
mark bailey
a matter of trust
in “4 steps to getting the fees you deserve,” rick telberg gave four tips i believe were directed to certified financial planners, but i believe apply equally to all engagements of service providers.
1. don’t procrastinate – (when discussing fees) not only for cfp’s but for all of us. always discuss the fee up front. establish the value and scope of the service up front. no one likes surprises. especially clients.
2. present the fee structure clearly
3. put your fees in context – “this might be a good time to explain what you are delivering for the feeâ€. i couldn’t agree more. by defining the scope you’ll avoid misunderstandings and establish each party’s responsibilities.
4. put it in writing – “make it clear you’re not hiding anythingâ€. we use a fixed price agreement which defines the scope, performance guarantee, responsibilities, and the fee. it is an addendum to the engagement letter for specific services.
while i am not aware of rick’s position on ‘pricing’ (establishing an agreement for the value for services in advance) versus ‘billing’ (sending an invoice as a surprise after the services are performed) with regard to other traditional accounting services, e.g. tax and assurance, his principles for cfp hold true nonetheless.
he hits the nail on the head: “in short, don’t be afraid to talk about fees. use it as an opportunity to build trust. if you’re open, honest, specific and unapologetic, your clients will trust you, and that trust is the support system of a productive and long-term relationship.]
shouldn’t this apply to all services, and not just those of the cfp’s?